Experienced engineering. Personal accountability.
CodeSignOff is a product of Avi Root Info Solutions. I am your accountable lead from the first conversation to the verdict, supported by our engineering bench in Delhi. Our leadership is based in the UK and we work with founders in the US, UK and Europe.
Experience that informs the review
My experience includes architecture for regulated-money systems: mortgage software used by UK intermediaries and a credit profiling and rating system. Our team’s work also includes an IoT engagement in Texas, an AI-assisted platform in India and recovery work in Canada. These are examples of our underlying engineering discipline, not claims of a long-standing CodeSignOff audit practice.
Architecture experience since 1998
Shekhar Juneja is Chief AI Officer at Avi Root Info Solutions, the company behind CodeSignOff. His software career began in 1998. His architecture experience includes UK mortgage software for intermediaries and a credit profiling and rating system. He architected systems and his teams delivered the builds. This engineering background informs CodeSignOff’s approach; it does not imply that those engagements were CodeSignOff audits.
Evidence before reassurance
We explain what we checked, what we found, and what remains uncertain. The purpose is to give you a practical decision and your engineers a clear starting point.
The audit gives you a verdict. You choose what follows.
The audit takes you from unchecked to checked. It identifies findings and the work needed to address them. Remediation is a separate decision, and you can take the plan to your own engineers. Technical readiness support is not a SOC 2 examination or certification.
How to read our engineering insights
Articles identify their author and publication date. CodeSignOff Editorial is an organisational byline, not a claim of personal review by Shekhar. Where disclosed, articles were prepared with AI assistance. Illustrative examples explain a method; they are not evidence of a client outcome. Source links let readers examine the underlying guidance. An article cannot establish whether your own application is secure: that requires an assessment of a defined code revision, environment and scope.